Browse the full Resources Index
Inventory presents its own valuation challenges that differ from those involved in pricing furniture, fixtures, or equipment. Unlike a piece of machinery that has a fairly stable identity over time, inventory is by nature something that turns over, meaning the specific units on a shelf at the moment of loss may bear little resemblance to what was on that shelf a month earlier or what will be there a month later. Establishing what was actually present and its value at the time of loss requires different tools than a typical fixed asset review.
Businesses commonly track inventory using either a first-in-first-out or last-in-first-out accounting method, and knowing which method a business uses affects how the cost basis of damaged goods is calculated. Point-of-sale records, purchase orders, and periodic physical inventory counts all serve as source documents for reconstructing what was on hand at a given date. A retailer with a modern inventory management system may be able to produce a fairly precise snapshot of stock levels as of the date of loss, while a smaller operation relying on manual counts may need to work from the most recent physical inventory adjusted for known sales and purchases in the intervening period.
The distinction between cost and selling price matters throughout this process. Inventory is typically valued at its cost to the business rather than at the retail price a customer would have paid, since the business’s insurable interest in unsold goods is generally what it paid to acquire or produce them, not the profit margin it hoped to earn. Some policies include specific provisions addressing this, and the calculation can become more layered for manufacturers who need to account for raw materials, work in process, and finished goods separately, each potentially valued differently depending on how far along the production process had progressed.
Perishable or time-sensitive inventory adds another layer of consideration, since goods that were already near the end of their usable life at the time of loss may warrant a different valuation than goods with a long shelf life still remaining. Seasonal inventory, common among Minnesota retailers stocking winter gear or holiday merchandise, can also complicate valuation when a loss occurs near a seasonal transition. These are documentation and calculation questions that benefit from clear accounting records, regardless of how the underlying coverage question is ultimately resolved.
Manufacturers face an additional layer of complexity when valuing work in process, meaning goods that are partially completed at the time of loss. Unlike raw materials, which are generally valued at their acquisition cost, work in process typically requires allocating a portion of labor and overhead already invested up to the point production stopped, since that value has been added to the materials even though the item was never finished or sold. Accounting records that already reflect depreciation or spoilage reserves for aging or slow-moving stock prior to the loss are also relevant, since those adjustments were presumably made for legitimate business reasons independent of the loss and generally carry forward into how the damaged inventory is valued afterward.
This article is general education about how the appraisal process commonly works. It is not legal advice, and specific procedures can vary by state and policy.
Russ Lis is a working property insurance appraiser and umpire based in Minnesota, serving clients nationwide. Contact Appraisal Resolution.