Browse the full Resources Index
Timing questions surround nearly every appraisal, and they rarely have a single answer. When does the clock start on a demand for appraisal. When must payment follow a signed award. Does invoking appraisal pause a lawsuit, or does it run alongside one. Each of these depends on policy language and state procedural rules, and attorneys advising clients through the process need to work from the specific documents rather than general assumptions.
Most policies require payment within a set number of days after the amount of loss is agreed upon or established by appraisal, often somewhere in the range of thirty days, though the exact figure and any conditions attached to it vary by carrier and by state minimum standards for claim payment. Some policies tie the payment obligation to the filing of a satisfactory proof of loss, which can itself become a point of dispute if the appraisal process addressed figures that were not part of an earlier proof of loss submission. Attorneys reviewing a completed award should check whether any additional documentation is still owed to the carrier before the payment clock starts running.
Appraisal can be invoked before litigation begins, after it begins, or, less commonly, after a verdict on liability but before damages are finally resolved. When a lawsuit is already pending, courts differ on whether appraisal should stay the litigation entirely, stay only the damages portion, or proceed in parallel. Some jurisdictions treat the appraisal clause as a condition precedent to filing suit over the amount of loss, meaning a court may dismiss or stay a premature filing until appraisal has run its course. Others allow the two tracks to continue simultaneously, particularly when coverage issues are also in dispute and cannot be resolved by an appraisal panel.
Statutes of limitations present another timing concern. Invoking appraisal does not automatically toll a limitations period in every jurisdiction, and attorneys should not assume that months spent in the appraisal process buy additional time to file suit unless the policy or governing law says so explicitly. Calendaring both the appraisal timeline and any underlying limitations deadline separately, rather than treating one as a substitute for the other, avoids an outcome where a valid claim becomes time-barred while the parties were still selecting an umpire.
Partial payments made before appraisal concludes also affect timing calculations. A carrier that has already paid an undisputed portion of a claim, then pays the difference after an award, may compute interest or penalty provisions differently than a carrier that made no payment until the award issued. Reviewing the payment history alongside the award is often necessary to determine whether the final payment complied with the applicable timing requirements.
Interest calculations add one more layer of complexity to settlement timing. Some states impose statutory interest on claim payments that fall outside a required payment window, and the question of when that window began to run, at the initial proof of loss, at the appraisal demand, or at the signed award, can itself become disputed. Attorneys should also check whether the policy or state law addresses interest on the appraisal award specifically, since general contract interest rules do not always apply automatically to an amount established through this particular dispute resolution mechanism, and the answer can materially affect the total sum ultimately owed.
This article is general education about how the appraisal process commonly works. It is not legal advice, and specific procedures can vary by state and policy.
Russ Lis is a working property insurance appraiser and umpire based in Minnesota, serving clients nationwide. Contact Appraisal Resolution.