Browse the full Resources Index
A surprising number of homes built with steep-slope roofing also carry a section or two of low-slope roofing that most people never notice until a claim brings it into focus. A porch roof tucked under a gable, a rear addition, a dormer cheek wall, or a garage tie-in is often finished in a membrane system such as EPDM rubber, TPO, or modified bitumen rather than the cedar shakes or architectural shingles covering the rest of the house. These sections exist because a roof pitch below roughly two units of rise in twelve units of run does not shed water reliably when shingled the conventional way, so builders switch systems rather than fight the geometry. A homeowner touring their own roof from the ground rarely realizes two different roofing products meet just above the eave line.
The two roofing families respond to storm events in different ways, which matters when a claim covers both. Cedar shakes and asphalt shingles are impact-tested and wind-rated under standards such as UL 2218 for impact resistance and ASTM D3161 or D7158 for wind resistance, and damage typically shows up as split wood, granule loss, or torn tabs that a roof inspector can document from the surface. Membrane roofing does not fail the same way. Hail can bruise EPDM without breaking the surface, leaving damage that is confirmed by probing or by a core cut rather than a visual granule count, and wind uplift on a membrane more often shows as a lifted seam or a compromised adhesive bond than as a missing piece. A hailstone large enough to crack a shingle tab may only leave a soft depression in rubber membrane, detectable by touch long before it is visible by eye.
Because the systems are different products with different life expectancies and different repair methods, they are frequently scoped as separate line items rather than folded into one roofing total. A cedar section might be priced by the square using regional labor and material costs for shake replacement, while the adjoining membrane section is priced by the square foot using a fully adhered or mechanically fastened system appropriate to that roof deck. Membrane thickness itself varies by product, commonly ranging from forty-five to sixty mils, and replacement pricing typically accounts for the specific thickness and attachment method originally installed rather than an assumed generic figure.
Transition flashing where the two systems meet deserves its own attention, since ice dam formation at these junctions is common in Minnesota winters and pre-existing flashing wear can be mistaken for storm damage if it is not evaluated carefully. A low-slope porch roof abutting a steep-slope main roof creates exactly the kind of snow-catching geometry that produces ice buildup along the transition, and years of that freeze-thaw cycling can degrade sealant and fasteners independent of any single storm event. Distinguishing that gradual wear from acute storm damage requires looking closely at the pattern of deterioration rather than assuming everything found at the transition traces to one date.
An appraiser working a file with mixed roofing systems generally documents each section on its own terms: photographs, measurements, and where appropriate a test square or core sample for the membrane area, alongside the more familiar shingle or shake evaluation for the steep-slope portion. This separation is not a matter of favoring a larger or smaller award; it reflects that the two materials genuinely fail differently and are repaired by different trades using different unit costs. Treating a low-slope patch as if it were simply more of the same shingle roof, or ignoring it because it is a small fraction of total roof area, tends to produce a less accurate picture of the loss either way.
This article is general education about how the appraisal process commonly works. It is not legal advice, and specific procedures can vary by state and policy.
Russ Lis is a working property insurance appraiser and umpire based in Minnesota, serving clients nationwide. Contact Appraisal Resolution.