Browse the full Resources Index
Before an appraisal or umpire engagement begins, it is standard practice to put the fee arrangement in writing, describing how the person will be compensated for their time on the file. This step is straightforward, but it matters because clarity about fees at the outset prevents misunderstandings later and gives both parties a way to evaluate whether the compensation structure could influence the outcome of the process they are about to enter. A brief conversation about rates before an engagement letter is signed can prevent a much longer conversation later about why an invoice looks different than what either side expected.
Hourly billing is a common structure, with the appraiser or umpire tracking time spent on document review, property inspection, drafting, communication with the other appraiser, and any hearings or conferences related to the dispute. Some appraisers instead use a flat fee for defined stages of the process, such as a set amount for the initial inspection and report, with additional hourly billing if the matter proceeds to a full appraisal panel with an umpire. Others use a per diem rate for inspection days combined with hourly rates for other work, particularly when travel is involved for an out of state assignment, since serving clients nationwide often means a full day set aside for a single property inspection once travel time is factored in.
What these structures share is that none of them varies based on the dollar amount of the final award. This distinguishes appraisal fee arrangements from, for example, contingency fee arrangements sometimes used by public adjusters or attorneys in other parts of a claim, where compensation is tied to a percentage of what is recovered. An appraiser or umpire being paid regardless of outcome has no financial reason to push the number in either direction, which is precisely the point of structuring compensation this way in the first place. The fee itself becomes a fixed cost of resolving the dispute rather than a variable tied to how the dispute is resolved, which keeps the incentive structure aligned with an accurate outcome rather than a particular result.
A written fee agreement typically specifies the hourly rate or flat fee amount, what expenses are billable separately such as mileage, lodging, or lab testing costs, how often invoices will be sent, and what happens if the engagement ends before the appraisal is complete. Having these terms documented in advance, rather than discussed informally over a phone call, reduces the chance of a dispute about payment complicating what is already a process meant to resolve a disagreement about property value.
Transparency about fees extends to disclosing the arrangement to the other party as well, not just to the client who is paying. When an umpire is selected, both appraisers and their respective parties typically know or can ask what the umpire’s rate is and how costs will be split between the two sides, which is often addressed directly in the policy’s appraisal clause and worth confirming before the umpire begins substantive work on the file. Many policies specify that each party pays their own chosen appraiser while splitting the umpire’s fee equally, a structure that reinforces the umpire’s neutral standing between the two sides throughout the engagement.
This article is general education about how the appraisal process commonly works. It is not legal advice, and specific procedures can vary by state and policy.
Russ Lis is a working property insurance appraiser and umpire based in Minnesota, serving clients nationwide. Contact Appraisal Resolution.