Browse the full Resources Index
When a hailstorm moves through a Minnesota condominium development, the association board becomes the central point of contact for the master insurance policy, even though every unit owner has a financial stake in how the claim resolves. The board typically holds the authority to retain contractors, negotiate with the carrier, and, when necessary, invoke the appraisal provision found in most property policies. Individual owners often want direct answers about their own units, but in most declarations the association, not the owner, is the named insured on the building coverage, which shapes who the carrier and any appraiser will communicate with as the primary party.
Clear communication channels matter more in a condominium claim than in a single-family loss because the number of interested parties is larger and the information often has to travel through a property manager before it reaches the board and then the ownership. Meeting minutes, written claim updates, and a designated liaison reduce the chance that owners hear conflicting versions of the same facts. Some associations post claim status updates on a resident portal or send periodic email summaries; others rely on the property manager to field questions individually. Neither approach is inherently better, but consistency helps prevent misunderstandings about what has actually been decided versus what is still under discussion.
The board’s fiduciary duty runs to the association as a whole, which sometimes creates tension when individual owners have differing priorities, such as one owner wanting cosmetic siding damage addressed quickly while another is focused on a leaking roof over a specific stack of units. An appraiser or umpire working an association claim generally deals with the board’s designated representative and does not take direction from individual unit owners, since the scope of the appraisal is defined by the policy and the disputed items identified by the two named appraisers, not by owner preference. This is a structural feature of how these policies are written, not a judgment about whose concerns matter more.
Property managers often serve as the working link between the board, the contractor, and the insurance company, tracking correspondence, scheduling inspections, and compiling documentation the appraisal panel may request. Because turnover in property management is common, associations that keep an organized claim file independent of any one manager’s institutional memory tend to move through the process more smoothly when a transition happens mid-claim. Board members change through election cycles too, and a claim that spans a year or more may see different people in leadership by the time it concludes, which makes written records more important than any single individual’s recollection. A claim binder or shared digital folder containing correspondence, estimates, and meeting minutes, accessible to whoever holds the relevant board position rather than tied to one person’s inbox, helps preserve continuity across these transitions.
Owners who want to stay informed can usually request updates through the channels the governing documents establish, such as attending open board meetings or reviewing published minutes, rather than contacting the carrier or appraiser directly. This keeps the flow of information consistent with how the association’s governing documents allocate authority and helps avoid the confusion that arises when multiple people relay slightly different accounts of the same conversation. In practice, associations that treat communication as a defined process, with clear ownership of updates and a single point of contact for the appraisal panel, tend to reach resolution with fewer procedural detours.
This article is general education about how the appraisal process commonly works. It is not legal advice, and specific procedures can vary by state and policy.
Russ Lis is a working property insurance appraiser and umpire based in Minnesota, serving clients nationwide. Contact Appraisal Resolution.