Browse the full Resources Index
Asphalt shingles depend on a self-sealing strip of modified bitumen that only bonds once it reaches a certain temperature, generally in the range of 40 to 70 degrees Fahrenheit depending on the manufacturer and the amount of sun exposure a slope receives. In much of Minnesota and the upper Midwest, that threshold is not reliably met for several months of the year, which means shingles installed in late fall, winter, or early spring may sit unsealed until warmer weather returns. Roofing contractors who work through the cold season know this and plan around it, but the physics do not change: a shingle that has not sealed is more vulnerable to wind uplift and blow-off than one that has bonded to the course below it.
Manufacturers publish specific cold weather guidance that goes beyond the general installation instructions used the rest of the year. Common measures include hand-sealing each tab with an approved asphalt roofing cement, using six nails per shingle instead of four in higher exposure areas, and avoiding installation when shingles are stiff and prone to cracking, since asphalt mat becomes less flexible as temperatures drop. Some manufacturers also caution against walking on shingles that have not warmed sufficiently, since foot traffic in cold conditions can fracture the mat in ways that are not always visible from the ground. Underlayment choice matters too; synthetic underlayments generally tolerate cold handling better than organic felt, which can become brittle and tear during winter installation.
Building codes generally do not spell out cold weather procedures directly. Instead, the International Residential Code addresses the issue by requiring that roof covering materials be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s installation instructions, which effectively pulls those cold weather requirements into the code compliance picture wherever that provision has been adopted. This is one of several points where code requirements and manufacturer specifications work together rather than as separate, competing standards.
Wind resistance for shingle products is also evaluated separately through laboratory testing conducted by organizations such as ASTM International, using protocols including ASTM D3161 and ASTM D7158 to classify shingles by wind speed rating under controlled conditions. Underwriters Laboratories similarly certifies certain products through impact and fire resistance testing. These ratings assume an installation performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions, including any temperature-dependent steps, and they are generated in a laboratory rather than on a roof in January in Minneapolis or Duluth. A shingle rated for a given wind speed under laboratory conditions does not carry the same demonstrated performance if the field installation departed from the instructions the rating relied on, which is part of why cold weather procedure and product testing are often discussed together rather than as unrelated topics.
In an appraisal setting, cold weather installation becomes relevant when there is a question about whether a shingle failure traces to a storm event or to how the roof was installed. Evidence such as the date of installation, weather conditions on that date, and whether hand-sealing was documented can all inform that analysis. The appraiser’s task in that scenario is limited to evaluating the physical evidence of damage and its likely cause and extent; whether an installation defect affects coverage under a given policy is a separate question left to the policy language and the parties involved.
This article is general education about how the appraisal process commonly works. It is not legal advice, and specific procedures can vary by state and policy.
Russ Lis is a working property insurance appraiser and umpire based in Minnesota, serving clients nationwide. Contact Appraisal Resolution.