Understanding Appraiser Availability After Major Storm Events

Browse the full Resources Index

When a large hail or wind event moves across a region, the volume of insurance claims that follow can strain every part of the claims system, and appraisal is no exception. A single significant storm in Minnesota or a neighboring state can generate thousands of claims within a matter of weeks, and a meaningful percentage of those claims eventually involve a disagreement over the amount of loss serious enough to invoke the policy’s appraisal provision. Experienced appraisers who handle this kind of work regularly can find their calendars filling quickly in the months following a major event, which is a practical reality worth understanding before selecting one.

The invocation of appraisal itself is usually not the bottleneck. Either party can typically demand appraisal once the process outlined in the policy has been followed, and that demand does not require the appraiser to be lined up in advance. The scheduling pressure tends to show up afterward, once each side has selected its appraiser and those two appraisers need to coordinate a joint inspection date, particularly for larger commercial properties or claims involving multiple buildings where the site visit itself takes real time. During a post storm surge, it is common for an inspection that might otherwise be scheduled within a couple of weeks to take somewhat longer simply because qualified appraisers are working through a backlog.

This dynamic affects how a policyholder or carrier should think about selecting an appraiser after a major event. Availability is a legitimate factor to weigh alongside experience and subject matter fit, since an appraiser with an excellent reputation but a calendar booked out for months may not be the right choice if the claim needs to move forward promptly. Asking directly about current caseload and realistic scheduling before making a selection avoids the frustration of choosing someone only to find the process stalls before it starts.

Experience with the specific property type and damage pattern involved in a claim also matters more, not less, during a high volume period, because appraisers who handle a large number of claims from the same storm event develop a detailed working familiarity with how that storm’s hail size, wind speeds, and damage signatures showed up across the region. This kind of pattern recognition, built from inspecting many roofs and elevations affected by the same weather system, can make the inspection and evaluation process more efficient without changing the fundamental standard applied to any individual property, which is still the specific physical evidence found at that address.

Regional storm surges are also a period when less experienced or less scrupulous individuals sometimes present themselves as appraisers without the background the role calls for. Checking an appraiser’s history of handling property claims, their familiarity with the relevant construction types, and where applicable their designations from organizations that train and credential appraisers is a reasonable step for either a policyholder or a carrier to take before agreeing to a selection, storm surge or not. The added demand after a major event does not lower the bar for who should be doing this work; if anything, it raises the value of choosing someone whose availability reflects genuine experience rather than opportunistic entry into a busy market.

This article offers general education on the appraisal process. Nothing here is legal advice, and state law and policy language govern each claim.

Based in Minnesota and serving clients nationwide, Russ Lis is a working property insurance appraiser and umpire. Contact Appraisal Resolution.