Sealant Bond Strength and Wind Damage Evaluations

Browse the full Resources Index

Every asphalt shingle produced for decades has relied on a factory-applied strip of thermoplastic adhesive positioned to bond one course of shingles to the course below it once the roof has been exposed to enough sun-driven heat to activate the sealant. This self-sealing feature is what keeps individual shingle tabs from lifting and flapping in ordinary wind, and its condition is central to any evaluation of whether wind has caused genuine damage or whether tabs that appear lifted were never properly sealed in the first place. The strip is engineered to soften at typical roof surface temperatures reached during a sunny day, even in cooler months, though the specific activation threshold varies somewhat by manufacturer and product line.

A basic field method for checking sealant bond is a manual lift or pull test, in which an inspector gently attempts to lift a shingle tab at its edge to feel how much resistance the sealant strip provides before releasing. A properly sealed shingle typically resists a light lift and, if separated, shows adhesive residue transferred between the tab and the course beneath it, indicating the bond had formed and was subsequently broken by an external force. A tab that lifts with little or no resistance and shows no adhesive transfer suggests the seal either never activated or failed independent of wind, which can happen when shingles are installed in cold weather with insufficient subsequent heat exposure, when dust or debris settles on the strip before adhesion occurs, or simply because the shingle is positioned in a shaded area that never reaches activation temperature.

Wind damage evaluations look beyond individual tabs to patterns across a slope. Creased shingles, where a tab has been folded back and re-laid with a visible crease line, differ physically from shingles that are simply unsealed, and the two are not interchangeable findings even though both can involve lifted tabs. Directionality matters as well, since wind-related displacement often shows a pattern consistent with prevailing storm direction, while unsealed shingles scattered without a clear directional pattern point more toward an installation or activation issue than a specific wind event. Elevation, exposure category, and surrounding terrain also factor into whether recorded wind speeds for a given storm date were sufficient to move shingles that were properly sealed, information that can be checked against National Weather Service data and site-specific exposure conditions. Photographs documenting the lift test itself, including any adhesive transfer observed, provide a more reviewable record than a written conclusion alone, particularly when findings are later compared against another inspector’s observations.

Because sealant activation depends heavily on ambient temperature and sun exposure, an inspection performed on a cold day may find sealant strips that feel firm and intact simply because they haven’t been warmed enough to soften and demonstrate their actual bond condition, so timing and conditions at inspection are worth recording alongside the findings themselves.

The physical evaluation of sealant condition and lift resistance produces facts about the shingle’s mechanical state. What those facts mean for coverage under a particular policy, including whether cosmetic tab lifting versus functional damage triggers different treatment, is determined by the policy language and the parties to the claim.

General education only: the appraisal process described here can vary by state and policy language, and nothing in this article is legal advice.

Russ Lis works nationwide as a property insurance appraiser and umpire, based in Minnesota. Contact Appraisal Resolution.