Property Inspections After an Award Is Issued

Browse the full Resources Index

An appraisal award generally closes the panel’s involvement in determining the amount of loss, but it does not necessarily close the door on every subsequent inspection of the property. Insurers commonly conduct a post-repair inspection once work is completed to confirm that repairs match the scope and specifications reflected in the award, particularly when recoverable depreciation is being held back until the work is finished and the carrier needs to verify completion before releasing that final payment.

These post-award inspections are typically administrative rather than adversarial, focused on confirming that the roofing material, siding, or interior finishes installed match what the award contemplated, that the work was performed by a licensed contractor where required, and that the property has been restored to a condition consistent with the agreed valuation. In Minnesota, where roofing work is often weather-dependent and repairs sometimes stretch across a construction season, the timing of this inspection can be affected by when contractors are able to complete the job, and it is common for a homeowner to coordinate the final walkthrough once shingles, flashing, and gutters are all in place. Retaining copies of contractor invoices, material receipts, and permit records from this stage of the claim is a practical habit, since these documents are frequently what an insurer requests before releasing any depreciation that was withheld pending completion of the repair work.

A separate category of post-award inspection arises if either party believes new damage has occurred since the award, unrelated to the original loss, such as a subsequent hailstorm or wind event. This kind of situation typically requires an entirely new claim and, if the amount cannot be agreed upon, a new appraisal demand, rather than any reopening of the prior award, since the original panel’s authority was limited to the specific loss and date at issue in that assignment.

Occasionally a party raises a concern that repairs were not completed to the standard reflected in the award, or that the contractor performed work that deviates from what was priced. These disputes are generally handled outside the appraisal framework, through direct communication between the parties, through the contractor’s warranty, or in some cases through the claims process itself rather than by reconvening the original panel, since the panel’s function was to value the loss at a point in time, not to serve as an ongoing construction inspector. Building code compliance during repair, including matters like proper ice dam protection along eaves or updated ventilation requirements, is generally the responsibility of the contractor and the local building inspector rather than a matter the original appraisal panel revisits after its award has been signed.

Because inspections that occur after an award has been signed can touch on matters like workmanship, code compliance, or a new and unrelated loss, they frequently move outside the scope of what an appraisal panel is positioned to address, and questions about how to proceed in those situations are best directed to the policy and the parties who administer it.

General education only: the appraisal process described here can vary by state and policy language, and nothing in this article is legal advice.

Russ Lis works nationwide as a property insurance appraiser and umpire, based in Minnesota. Contact Appraisal Resolution.