How Umpire Fees Are Structured and Shared

Browse the full Resources Index

Umpire compensation follows a fairly consistent pattern across the property insurance appraisal industry, though the specific numbers and arrangements vary by region, by the complexity of the claim, and by the umpire’s own practice. Most umpires bill either an hourly rate or a flat fee tied to the estimated scope of the assignment, and many require a retainer before beginning substantive work, a practice that reflects the reality that an umpire is typically not a party to the underlying insurance contract and has no independent means of enforcing payment after the fact.

The prevailing convention, and the one most appraisal clauses explicitly require, is that the umpire’s fee is split equally between the insurer and the policyholder, regardless of which party ultimately fares better in the award. This equal-split structure is intended to preserve the umpire’s neutrality, since an umpire whose compensation depended on the outcome, or who was paid entirely by one side, would present an obvious conflict inconsistent with the disinterested role the position is meant to occupy. Each party’s own appraiser, by contrast, is typically paid solely by the party who retained them, which is a separate arrangement from the shared umpire fee. Some policies address what happens if one party’s appraiser incurs unusually high fees relative to the other, though this is generally a matter between that party and their own appraiser rather than something that affects the umpire’s separately negotiated and equally shared compensation.

Fee amounts tend to correlate with the scope and complexity of the claim rather than following a fixed schedule. A straightforward residential roof dispute with a limited number of line items in disagreement generally requires less umpire time than a large commercial loss involving multiple buildings, specialized equipment, or extensive documentation review, and fee estimates reflect that difference. Travel time, the number of site visits required, and the volume of competing estimates or expert reports submitted by each side can all factor into the total.

Some umpires provide a written fee agreement or engagement letter at the outset of an assignment, outlining the rate structure, the retainer amount, and how additional charges beyond the retainer will be billed and split. This kind of upfront clarity tends to reduce friction later, since both parties know what to expect financially before the substantive work of reviewing documentation and inspecting the property begins. An engagement letter of this kind often also states the umpire’s cancellation or rescheduling policy for a site visit, which matters in practice given how often a Minnesota inspection date has to be moved because of weather that makes roof access unsafe.

Disputes over an umpire’s fee are relatively uncommon but do occasionally arise, typically when a claim turns out to be more time-consuming than either party anticipated. These situations are generally addressed through direct communication and, where necessary, reference to the terms of the original fee agreement, rather than through the appraisal award itself, since the award is meant to reflect amount of loss, not the administrative costs of reaching it.

This article is general education about how the appraisal process commonly works. It is not legal advice, and specific procedures can vary by state and policy.

Russ Lis is a working property insurance appraiser and umpire based in Minnesota, serving clients nationwide. Contact Appraisal Resolution.